Wing's Thoughts

The question never asked: why was Woo fired? ('St. Louis Post-Dispatch' editor William F. Woo)(Here)(Editorial): An article


By wwong - Posted on 08 April 2008

no image

This digital document is an article from St. Louis Journalism Review, published by SJR St. Louis Journalism Review on July 1, 1996. The length of the article is 1051 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.From the supplier: 'St. Louis Post-Dispatch' editor William F. Woo neither resigned nor retired, but was fired. This was never mentioned in the article written by Harry Levins for the paper and thus the question why Woo was fired had never been asked. William Pulitzer, chairman of the Pulitzer Publishing Co. has the responsibility to clarify this issue to set a precedent for the rest of those in power whose arrogant silence has to be broken with accurate and factual reportage.Citation DetailsTitle: The question never asked: why was Woo fired? ('St. Louis Post-Dispatch' editor William F. Woo)(Here)(Editorial)Author: Ed BishopPublication: St. Louis Journalism Review (Magazine/Journal)Date: July 1, 1996Publisher: SJR St. Louis Journalism ReviewVolume: v26 Issue: n188 Page: p2(1)Article Type: EditorialDistributed by Thomson Gale

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.wingtangwong.com/trackback/3877